EPIC vs Traditional
Start your project →
COMPARISON TOOL

Time = money.
Show it.

Compare EPIC Plug&Live™ vs traditional build on four dimensions: time-to-open, CAPEX, lost revenue from delay, and a CO₂ proxy.

Illustrative proxies — built for client conversations.
1 — INPUTS
Two scenarios, same program.
units
Total rentable units.
m²
Used for CO₂ proxy (area-based).
days
365 for year-round. Otherwise seasonal.
€ / night
Blended average nightly rate.
%
Used for revenue loss estimate.
%
F&B / spa / activities uplift as a simple proxy.
months
From “go” to opening (your estimate).
months
From “go” to opening (your estimate).
Lost revenue is estimated from the difference between time-to-open scenarios. If traditional takes longer, that delay = missed operating months.
€
Total project CAPEX under EPIC approach.
€
Total project CAPEX under traditional build.
kgCO₂e / m²
Proxy only (area-based).
kgCO₂e / m²
Proxy only (area-based).
%
Proxy: factory-controlled build tends to reduce waste.
%
Proxy only (site-built waste varies widely).
CO₂ and waste are shown as proxies for early comparison. Use project-specific LCA for investor-grade reporting.
Your EPIC time-to-open is longer than traditional. Lost revenue will be zero (or negative). Check if the timeline inputs are correct.
Copied ✅

Please fill in all required fields with valid numbers.

How to use this

Use it as a sales + investor alignment tool: if EPIC opens earlier, the missed months of revenue can be material. For underwriting, we’d refine this with monthly seasonality and ramp-up.

Want to validate your case with EPIC? Start here →